The Supreme Court today refused to intervene in the legislative process on the amendments to the law on Whistleblower's Protection Act 2011. The apex court said Parliament is seized of the matter and by asking the legislature about the proposed amendments, it cannot breach the limit. '<br/><br/>Reply from the bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar came brushing aside the protest of activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan that these would dilute the provisions of the original 2011 Act.<br/><br/>

The Supreme Court today refused to intervene in the legislative process on the amendments to the law on Whistleblower's Protection Act 2011. The apex court said Parliament is seized of the matter and by asking the legislature about the proposed amendments, it cannot breach the limit. '<br/><br/>Reply from the bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar came brushing aside the protest of activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan that these would dilute the provisions of the original 2011 Act.<br/><br/>

The Supreme Court today refused to intervene in the legislative process on the amendments to the law on Whistleblower's Protection Act 2011. The apex court said Parliament is seized of the matter and by asking the legislature about the proposed amendments, it cannot breach the limit. '<br/><br/>Reply from the bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar came brushing aside the protest of activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan that these would dilute the provisions of the original 2011 Act.<br/><br/>

The Supreme Court today refused to intervene in the legislative process on the amendments to the law on Whistleblower's Protection Act 2011. The apex court said Parliament is seized of the matter and by asking the legislature about the proposed amendments, it cannot breach the limit. '<br/><br/>Reply from the bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar came brushing aside the protest of activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan that these would dilute the provisions of the original 2011 Act.<br/><br/>

The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the legislative process on the amendments to the law on Whistleblower's Protection Act 2011. The apex court said Parliament is seized of the matter and by asking the legislature about the proposed amendments, it cannot breach the limit. <br/><br/>Reply from the bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar came brushing aside the protest of lawyer Prashant Bhushan that these would dilute the provisions of the original Act.<br/><br/>During the hearing when the bench said that it would dispose of the petition, the petitioner Bhushan said, he was not asking for a direction to Parliament, but since the President's assent to the Act, which is yet to be notified, is awaited, certain features of the important law can be considered and a direction can be given.