The Supreme Court has ruled that in rape cases there is no need for corroboration and conviction can be imposed on the sole statement of the victim as her testimony cannot be looked at with suspicion.

The apex court said it is a trite law that a woman, who is the victim of sexual assault, is not an accomplice to the crime but is a victim of another person's lust. The Prosecutrix stands at a higher pedestal than an injured witness as she suffers from emotional injury.

Therefore, her evidence need not be tested with the same amount of suspicion as that of an accomplice.
A bench of justices P Sathasivam and B S Chauhan passed the ruling while dismissing an appeal filed by Mohd Imran Khan and Jamal Ahmed challenging their conviction for rape of a minor girl about 22 years ago. The defence had argued the victim's statement cannot be relied upon as she had eloped with the accused.