The three-judge committee of the Supreme Court has concluded that the statement of the law intern, who had complained against Justice A K Ganguly, prima facie discloses an act of unwelcome behaviour and conduct of sexual nature on the part of the retired judge.

The Supreme Court, however, made it clear that no further follow up action is required by it in view of the fact that Justice Ganguly had demitted office on the date of the incident December 24 last year.

Justice Sathasivam said considering the fact that the said intern was not an intern on the roll of the Supreme Court and that the concerned Judge had already demitted office on account of superannuation on the date of the incident, no further follow up action is required by this Court.

Meanwhile Justice Ganguly today refused to comment on his reported indictment by a three-judge Supreme Court panel in the complaint filed by a law intern against him. Ganguly has all along denied the allegation made against him.